Autobiography, Aesthetics and Politics

Educating for World Spectatorship

Abstract

The authors explore the synthetical (currere) possibilities of aesthetic encounters to disrupt the instrumentalization of teaching and teachers under a neoliberal, capitalist regime and provoke new ways of seeing, and feeling, political change. Key-words: neoliberalism; currere; political change.

Author Biographies

Anne M. Phelan, University of British Columbia, Canada
She is a Professor in the Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, and co-Director of the Centre for the Study of Teacher Education, at the University of British Columbia. She is also Honorary Professor in the Department of Policy and Leadership at the Education University of Hong Kong. Her research focuses on the intellectual and political freedom of K-12 teachers and on the creation of teacher education programs and policies that support that end. Her work has explored (a) the relationship between language, subjectivity, and practice; and (b) the dynamic of judgment and responsibility; and (c) the paradoxes of autonomy (creativity and resistance) in teacher education and in professional life. Her current SSHRC-funded research, with Dr. Melanie Janzen (University of Manitoba), examines the anxiety of obligation in teaching and its relationship to teacher attrition
Matthew Clarke, York St John University, United Kingdom
Chair Professor in Education at York St John University since 2015. Previously, he has taught and researched at UNSW, Australia, the University of Hong Kong, the Higher Colleges of Technology, United Arab Emirates, and the University of Melbourne, Australia. His undergraduate studies were in Politics and Philosophy (Oxford), after which he moved into Education, in which he hold a PGCE (Primary) from the University of Surrey, as well as, a PGDE (TESOL), M.Ed. and PhD from the University of Melbourne. His research in educational policy, published in leading international journals, is internationally recognised as contributing to a new interdisciplinary field that brings together political and psychoanalytic theory to provide novel and significant critical insights into global policy issues in education and teacher education. He is a co-editor for the Sage journal, Research in Education: Theory, Policy and Practice, and he also serves on the editorial boards for Power and Education and Other Education: A Journal of Educational Alternatives.

References

Bollas, C. (1993). Being a character: Psychoanalysis and self-experience. London, UK: Routledge.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Biesta, G. (2013). The beautiful risk of education. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso.
Britzman, D. (2011). Freud and education. New York: Routledge.
Clarke, M., Michell, M., & Ellis, N. J. (2016). Dialectics of development: Teacher identity formation in the interplay of ideal ego and ego ideal. Teaching Education, 28(2), 115-130.
Clarke, M., & Phelan, A. (2017). Teacher education and the political: The power of negative thinking. London: Routledge.
Department for Education (DfE). (2016). Educational excellence everywhere. UK: HMSO.
Donald, J. (1992). Sentimental education: Schooling, popular culture and the regulation of liberty. London: Verso.
Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Jones, C. A. (2007). The Painting in the Attic. In Sherry Turkle (Ed.) Evocative objects: Things we think with. Boston, MA.: MIT Press.
Kosofsky Sedgwick, E. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Lacan, J. (1992). Seminar VII: The ethics of pyschoanalysis (D. Porter, Trans.). New York: Norton..
Lang, F. (1927). Metropolis. Germany: Kino International.
Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self: Psychic survival in troubled times. New York: Norton.
Lewis, T. E. (2012). The aesthetics of education: Theature, curiosity, and politics in the work of Jacques Rancière and Paulo Freire. London: Bloomsbury.
Machover, T. (2007). My Cello. In Sherry Turkle (Ed.) Evocative objects: Things we think with. Boston, MA.: MIT Press.
McGowan, T. (2013). Enjoying what we don't have: The political project of psychoanalysis. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
McGowan, T. (2016). Capitalism and desire: The psychic cost of free markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (2007). The Melbourne train. In Sherry Turkle (Ed.) Evocative objects: Things we think with. Boston, MA.: MIT Press.
Moore, A., & Clarke, M. (2016). ‘Cruel optimism’: Teacher attachment to professionalism in an era of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 31(5), 666-677.
Nettleton, S. (2016). The metapsychology of Christopher Bollas: An introduction. London, UK: Routledge.
Pinar, W. F. & Grumet, M. R. (2015). Toward a poor curriculum (3rd edition). Kingston, NY: Educator's International Press.
Pinar, W. F. (2012). What is curriculum theory? (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pinar, W. F. (1991). The white cockatoo: Images of abstract expressionism in curriculum theory. In G. Willis & W. H. Schubert (Eds.), Reflections from the heart of educational inquiry (pp. 244-249). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Rancière, J. (2011). The emancipated spectator. London: Verso.
Silverman, K. (2000). World spectators. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Slattery, P. (2017). "I am nature": Understanding the possibilities of currere in curriculum studies and aesthetics. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 14(3), 184-195.
Taubman, P.M. (2009). Teaching by numbers: Deconstructing the discourse of standards and accountability in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Turkle, S. (2007). Evocative objects: Things we think with. Boston, MA.: MIT Press.
Published
2019-12-07