College student study habits: Initial patterns and implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14288/cjur.v7i1.196035Abstract
This paper investigated whether or not there were any consistent patterns in the study habits of college students and whether or not college students studied differently than university students. Results showed that high-achieving students self-reported coming to class regularly, and they frequently used elaborative study techniques (e.g., relating readings to lecture) which have been related to better memory performance in previously published studies (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Gurung, et al., 2010). However, these high-achieving students were still weak in their use of metacognitive skills in their studying (e.g., reviewing the questions they answered incorrectly). These results were compared to a study by Gurung et al. (2010), which used the same questions as this study to identify patterns. The comparison between university and college students is an important first step in better understanding how different types of students study and whether the effectiveness of their strategies differ. Future research should replicate this study using a larger sample of college students.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).