Semantic fieldwork: How experimental should we be?
Keywords:Salish, Tsimshianic, St’át’imcets, Gitksan, fieldwork, experiments
In recent years there has been an increase in formal semantic research that is based on quan- titative data collection methodologies (a.k.a. ‘experiments’). At the same time, many researchers are conducting non-quantitative fieldwork-based studies, and still other papers rely on introspective data by the authors. In this paper I focus on methodologies for hypothesis-driven semantic fieldwork. The core question is whether and how the methodologies semantic fieldworkers are currently using should change, in response to challenges from both a typological angle (e.g., Aikhenvald 2018) and an experimental angle (e.g., Gibson and Fedorenko 2013). I support Davidson’s (2020) proposal that experimental is a gradable predicate (i.e., there is no simple two-way dichotomy between experimen- tal and non-experimental research), and that research can often be made more robust by adopting some practices from experimental fields. However, I argue that ‘more experimental’ is not always ‘better’.
LicenseCopyright (c) 2022 Lisa Matthewson
Authors of articles retain the copyright of the text and data in the article itself, unless otherwise specified in the article.
However, storyboards and other visual materials that accompany the articles are distributed with the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Canada (CC-BY 2.5 CA) license, which allows the creation of derivative works (including commercial derivative works). To redistribute a storyboard or other visual material in any form, modified or unmodified, you must give appropriate credit to the original author, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. It is not necessary to license a derivative work with the CC-BY CA 2.5 license or any other Creative Commons license.