Beyond Contentious Collective Action

Assessing Quiet Forms of Environmental Mobilization in Rural British Columbia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.no221.198580

Keywords:

mining, Mount Polley Mine, disaster response, protest, letters and letter writing

Abstract

Technological disasters often serve as catalysts for contentious collective action as affected communities seek accountability and better environmental regulation from responsible organizational and institutional actors. The 2014 Mount Polley mining disaster triggered Indigenous and Canada-wide mobilizations, but contentious collective action did not emerge among rural Quesnel Lake area residents located at the epicentre of the disaster. Drawing on an analysis of forty-two interviews and 208 newspaper articles, I show how rural Quesnel Lake area residents engaged in quiet forms of mobilization rooted in civic practices such as participating in consultations, writing letters to government and corporate officials, debating environmental risks through traditional news media, and establishing interest groups. I highlight how tactics associated with quiet mobilization changed across two critical environmental periods marked by the aftermath of the disaster itself (2014–15) and the introduction of Mount Polley’s wastewater plans (2016–19). Quiet mobilization in the first period included individual tactics such as letter-writing that were both critical and supportive of organizational responses to the disaster. Mobilization transformed in the second period to include a blend of individual and collective tactics that were decidedly critical and rooted in institutional forms of advocacy such as wastewater permit appeals. I argue that disregarding quiet forms of mobilization in favour of emphasizing contentious collective action neglects the crucial role of individual and collective tactics that characterize political participation in rural, working-class, and predominantly white settler communities. By shedding light on quiet mobilization, I contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of how rural residents in settler communities participate in addressing disasters and mounting environmental risks.

Author Biography

Max Chewinski, University of Alberta

Max Chewinski is an independent researcher with expertise in social movements and the human dimensions of natural resources and renewable energy development. He is a former postdoctoral research fellow in the Department of Resource Economics and Environmental sociology at the University of Alberta. Prior to this, Max obtained a PhD in sociology from the University of British Columbia. Max’s research has been published in journals that include Environmental Sociology, American Behavioral Scientist, and Social Movement Studies.

 

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30